Church Planters Blogs

A short description about your blog

Mar 06
2010

Is longevity the sign of a successful church plant?

Posted by: Barney Barron

Tagged in: Untagged 

Barney Barron

Recently we faced some challenges that for a moment threatened the feasability of our church meeting.  We got through it okay but it made me question if it had all collapsed would that mean we had failed and the last seven years had been a waste of time? 
The church is or at least should be seen as essentially missional.  God is a missionary God.  The church are a pilgrim people, we are called out and sent back but we are only temporary residents.  We often see church as an institution to which we call people to and see success of a church in terms of how many members it has and its longevity. 

I believe the church is essentially organic, temporal and fluid.  It may be right for a body of believers to come together for a time but they are not necessarily covenanted together until Jesus returns.  That is not to say I don’t want to see existing churches flourish and grow. It is to say that we can’t afford to stay put and expect the world to come and join our club.  The church needs to continually incarnate itself into the world and its different communities and cultures. We need to be prepared to adapt and re:invent ourselves in order to stay fresh.  This may mean allowing a local church to die in order that new life can grow.

Comments (2)add
Ivan King
...
Ivan King , 13 April 2010
I agree with David: the only valid criterion is obedience to God's call, although we should also be careful to avoid unnecessary pastoral hurt to fragile congregations. I am sure we have all heard good work dismissed as 'gmmicks' by Christians, who feel that the acid test of mission is that it should be bth perpetual and identical to 'their' expression of faith....
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
David Newton
...
David Newton , 12 April 2010
This is a really helpful and important observation. When involved ion my first plant a colleague pointed out that, 'It has to work, there is so much invested in it. It would be too embarrassing if it failed.'
This seemed a very strange comment to me. My only criteria was obedience. We felt God called us to plant this ministry, what He did with it was up to Him. In fact it is still continuing after more than 20 years.
The second plant, from Clayton, lasted 5 years and, having gone from 12 to 35 and back to 10, the group returned to the mother. In this case I was also sure we should plant, and was also sure that we should 'unplant'. In this case we learned a huge amount about what church should look like for the 21st Century and the mother church adopted many characteristics of the daughter, and took them further to create a model of being the church which was vibrant and effective in mission.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Register for members area, email news & meet others.

regional groups